<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should residents be allowed to raise up to 5 chickens inside the city limits?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sgna.us/blog/index.php/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:30:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paris Wulf</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-7927</link>
		<dc:creator>Paris Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-7927</guid>
		<description>Excellent Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Car Shippers</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-7787</link>
		<dc:creator>Car Shippers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 21:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-7787</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always enjoyed your blog. You are great with the fresh new content you consistently post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always enjoyed your blog. You are great with the fresh new content you consistently post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pura Duffek</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-7163</link>
		<dc:creator>Pura Duffek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-7163</guid>
		<description>Lengthy ago i purchased an Chicken House that was flat packed and spent Saturday morning putting it together. Should you be thinking to build a hen house, why not consider investing in a pre-fabricated chicken house kit for the same price as buying the materials to make your own private? This can save you time and effort and headache and you won?t have any doubt in showing your folks the finished work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lengthy ago i purchased an Chicken House that was flat packed and spent Saturday morning putting it together. Should you be thinking to build a hen house, why not consider investing in a pre-fabricated chicken house kit for the same price as buying the materials to make your own private? This can save you time and effort and headache and you won?t have any doubt in showing your folks the finished work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynee</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-7003</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-7003</guid>
		<description>Salem, Oregon will finally allow backyard chickens effective Jan. 1, 2011.

For details of the ordinance, click the link below.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salemchickens.com/Salems_Ordinance.doc&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Salem&#039;s Chicken Ordinance&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salem, Oregon will finally allow backyard chickens effective Jan. 1, 2011.</p>
<p>For details of the ordinance, click the link below.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salemchickens.com/Salems_Ordinance.doc" rel="nofollow">Salem&#8217;s Chicken Ordinance</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harold planner</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-6474</link>
		<dc:creator>harold planner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-6474</guid>
		<description>I completely agree, great aricle! I&#039;m glad you went down that route</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree, great aricle! I&#8217;m glad you went down that route</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: housewarming ift ideas</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-6437</link>
		<dc:creator>housewarming ift ideas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-6437</guid>
		<description>I  must confess I am very impressed with that.  I&#039;ve glanced at a lot concerning it already however your point of view extremely widened my mind to a different way of thinking.  Cheers .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  must confess I am very impressed with that.  I&#8217;ve glanced at a lot concerning it already however your point of view extremely widened my mind to a different way of thinking.  Cheers .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madeleleine I Parker</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-5332</link>
		<dc:creator>Madeleleine I Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-5332</guid>
		<description>Like your stuff - as a kindred chicken spirit I&#039;ll be back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like your stuff &#8211; as a kindred chicken spirit I&#8217;ll be back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potbelly pigs</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-4458</link>
		<dc:creator>Potbelly pigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-4458</guid>
		<description>Great read, had to re-read it a few times so I could process everything, but you seem to know what your talking about when it comes to animals!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great read, had to re-read it a few times so I could process everything, but you seem to know what your talking about when it comes to animals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heetsneKneupt</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-3985</link>
		<dc:creator>heetsneKneupt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-3985</guid>
		<description>Wow, I didn&#039;t know about that up to now. Thanx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I didn&#8217;t know about that up to now. Thanx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dynee</title>
		<link>http://sgna.us/blog/2009/01/24/raising-chickens-inside-the-city-limits/comment-page-1/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>Dynee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sgna.us/blog/?p=77#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>Here is the latest update on the chicken debate.

Council seeks ways to allow chickens in city yards

THELMA GUERRERO-HUSTON Statesman Journal
September 15, 2009

Salem City Council on Monday dismissed a recommendation by the city&#039;s Planning Commission to not allow the keeping of chickens in residential areas, deciding instead to work toward hatching a plan that could allow hens to reside in city limits.

In a 5-3 vote in favor of a substitute motion made by Ward 7 City Councilor Bob Cannon, councilors directed staffers to draft two separate ordinances regarding chickens and return the proposals to the council at a later meeting.

One ordinance would seek to amend the current city code&#039;s definition of chickens as &quot;livestock.&quot;

If approved, the second ordinance would define chickens as pets. 

&quot;This way, it gets the issue out of land use, where it takes 45 or more days to get anything done,&quot; said Ward 3 City Councilor Brad Nanke.

The chicken keeping topic first reared its head Feb. 23, when pro-chicken activists argued their case before city councilors.

Since then, the issue has been mulled on and off at Salem City Council meetings.

On June 22, the council approved a resolution seeking to amend city code concerning the keeping of chickens in backyards and to remove the regulation regarding city chickens from the zoning code.

In keeping with code procedures, the proposed amendment was forwarded to the city&#039;s Planning Commission.

After giving notice to neighborhood associations, and the boards of Commissioners for Marion and Polk counties, the commission then held a public hearing about the issue Aug. 18.

Afterward, the commission voted against modifying the code.

In its response to the council, the commission wrote that public testimony showed that pets already allowed as domestic animals cause problems between neighbors.

&quot;The addition of chickens, which are not generally accepted as urban pets, will infringe on those neighbors who are not as supportive of the keeping of chickens ... resulting in potential impacts to quality of life contrary to the intent and purpose of the zoning code,&quot; the commission
wrote.

tguerrer@StatesmanJournal.com or (503) 399-6815</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the latest update on the chicken debate.</p>
<p>Council seeks ways to allow chickens in city yards</p>
<p>THELMA GUERRERO-HUSTON Statesman Journal<br />
September 15, 2009</p>
<p>Salem City Council on Monday dismissed a recommendation by the city&#8217;s Planning Commission to not allow the keeping of chickens in residential areas, deciding instead to work toward hatching a plan that could allow hens to reside in city limits.</p>
<p>In a 5-3 vote in favor of a substitute motion made by Ward 7 City Councilor Bob Cannon, councilors directed staffers to draft two separate ordinances regarding chickens and return the proposals to the council at a later meeting.</p>
<p>One ordinance would seek to amend the current city code&#8217;s definition of chickens as &#8220;livestock.&#8221;</p>
<p>If approved, the second ordinance would define chickens as pets. </p>
<p>&#8220;This way, it gets the issue out of land use, where it takes 45 or more days to get anything done,&#8221; said Ward 3 City Councilor Brad Nanke.</p>
<p>The chicken keeping topic first reared its head Feb. 23, when pro-chicken activists argued their case before city councilors.</p>
<p>Since then, the issue has been mulled on and off at Salem City Council meetings.</p>
<p>On June 22, the council approved a resolution seeking to amend city code concerning the keeping of chickens in backyards and to remove the regulation regarding city chickens from the zoning code.</p>
<p>In keeping with code procedures, the proposed amendment was forwarded to the city&#8217;s Planning Commission.</p>
<p>After giving notice to neighborhood associations, and the boards of Commissioners for Marion and Polk counties, the commission then held a public hearing about the issue Aug. 18.</p>
<p>Afterward, the commission voted against modifying the code.</p>
<p>In its response to the council, the commission wrote that public testimony showed that pets already allowed as domestic animals cause problems between neighbors.</p>
<p>&#8220;The addition of chickens, which are not generally accepted as urban pets, will infringe on those neighbors who are not as supportive of the keeping of chickens &#8230; resulting in potential impacts to quality of life contrary to the intent and purpose of the zoning code,&#8221; the commission<br />
wrote.</p>
<p><a href="mailto:tguerrer@StatesmanJournal.com">tguerrer@StatesmanJournal.com</a> or (503) 399-6815</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

